Economy May 25, 2026 06:27 AM

Anthropic Co-Founder Urges Broader Oversight of AI Beyond Tech Firms

At a Vatican presentation of the pope's encyclical on artificial intelligence, Anthropic's Chris Olah warns of large-scale job displacement and calls for external scrutiny

By Nina Shah

Speaking at the Vatican during the presentation of Pope Leo's first encyclical on artificial intelligence, Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah argued that responsibility for the trajectory of AI cannot rest solely with technology companies. He warned of the 'real possibility' that AI could displace workers 'at very large scale' and said supporting those affected would be a moral imperative. Olah stressed that commercial, geopolitical and personal pressures on AI firms can conflict with society's broader interests and that outside oversight is essential.

Anthropic Co-Founder Urges Broader Oversight of AI Beyond Tech Firms

Key Points

  • Chris Olah said AI development should not be left solely to technology companies and called for oversight from religious leaders, governments and civil society - impacts technology and public policy.
  • Olah warned of "a real possibility" that AI will displace human labor "at very large scale" and said supporting displaced workers would be "a moral imperative of historic proportions" - impacts labor markets and social welfare policy.
  • He cited strong commercial, geopolitical and personal pressures on AI firms that can conflict with broader societal interests, arguing this dynamic makes external scrutiny essential - impacts governance of AI and corporate behavior.

Vatican City, May 25 - Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah told attendees at the Vatican on Monday that the development of artificial intelligence should not be the exclusive domain of technology companies, calling instead for increased engagement from religious leaders, governments and civil society.

Olah was speaking at the presentation of Pope Leo's first encyclical on artificial intelligence and shared the stage with the pope. He cautioned there is "a real possibility" that AI will displace human labor "at very large scale," and said that should such displacement occur, "supporting those displaced will be a moral imperative of historic proportions."

Pointing to the pressures that shape decisions inside private AI firms, Olah said companies like his face strong commercial, geopolitical and personal incentives that can run counter to wider social interests. He argued those internal dynamics make external oversight necessary.

"Every frontier AI lab ... operates inside a set of incentives and constraints that can sometimes conflict with doing the right thing," Olah said, adding that even well-intentioned researchers remain influenced by those forces.

Olah linked those incentive structures to the need for scrutiny from parties outside the technology industry. He specifically urged greater involvement from religious leaders, governments and civil society in shaping how AI advances, framing such involvement as vital to ensure technology development aligns with broader public interests.

The points Olah raised centered on two interrelated concerns: the potential scale of workforce displacement from AI-driven automation and the limits of self-regulation within commercial AI organizations. He framed both as moral and governance questions rather than purely technical or commercial issues.

At the Vatican event, the juxtaposition of a tech industry leader and the pope underscored the breadth of stakeholders Olah said should participate in oversight - a group he described as extending beyond the corporate sector to include faith institutions and civic actors.

Olah concluded that the combination of powerful incentives inside AI labs and the potentially large social impacts of their work make outside scrutiny indispensable for guiding AI in a direction consistent with society's values and responsibilities.

Risks

  • Large-scale displacement of human labor due to AI adoption, creating social and economic strains on labor markets and public welfare systems.
  • Conflicting incentives within frontier AI labs - commercial, geopolitical and personal pressures - that may lead firms to act in ways misaligned with broader societal interests, affecting technology sector conduct.
  • Insufficient external oversight of AI development, which could leave potential harms unaddressed and limit accountability across stakeholders including governments and civil society.

More from Economy

SpaceX IPO, ECB Rate Move and Global Data Set the Week’s Market Agenda Jun 5, 2026 AirTrunk Pledges $30 Billion to Build 5 GW of Data Centre Capacity in India by 2030 Jun 5, 2026 Bank Indonesia to Draft Rules to Reflect Expanded Economic Mandate Jun 5, 2026 UK Home Prices Slip in May as Middle East Tensions and Cost Pressures Curb Demand Jun 5, 2026 Fitch Lowers Global Growth Forecast, Raises Oil Price Outlook Amid US-Iran Conflict Jun 5, 2026