Economy February 9, 2026

Administration Seeks to Move Federal Dismissal Appeals Under White House Control

Proposal would strip fired federal workers of appeals to independent board, routing disputes to OPM director who reports to the president

By Avery Klein
Administration Seeks to Move Federal Dismissal Appeals Under White House Control

The Office of Personnel Management proposed a rule to remove the Merit Systems Protection Board as the avenue for federal employees to contest terminations. Under the plan, appeals would instead be handled by the OPM, whose director reports directly to President Donald Trump, representing a transfer of review authority from an independent tribunal to an executive agency and aligning with the administration's push to reduce federal employment.

Key Points

  • Proposal would remove fired federal employees' right to appeal dismissals before the Merit Systems Protection Board.
  • Appeals would be redirected to the Office of Personnel Management, led by a director who reports directly to President Donald Trump.
  • The move aligns with the administration's stated objective of reducing the size of the federal government, including mass layoffs of government employees; sectors affected include the federal workforce and public-sector labor markets.

The federal government disclosed a proposal that would curtail the appeal rights available to federal workers who are fired, replacing the existing independent review process with an internal channel overseen by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

According to the plan released by OPM, employees who lose their positions would no longer take dismissal disputes to the Merit Systems Protection Board. Instead, they would be required to pursue appeals through the OPM itself. The OPM director serves in a position that reports directly to President Donald Trump.

This modification would shift the locus of employment dispute resolution from an independent administrative board to an executive branch agency under presidential authority. Advocates of the change argue it places decision-making within the agency responsible for personnel policy, while critics would note it represents a transfer of review power away from a separate, independent body.

The proposal also ties into the administration's stated priorities for federal workforce reductions. President Trump has framed large-scale cuts to government staffing as a central objective of his second term, and the proposed rule would be consistent with that broader agenda.

Officials presenting the plan described it as a revision of the procedural path available to dismissed federal employees. The specific mechanics would replace the Merit Systems Protection Board appeals process with a route administered by OPM, consolidating oversight of personnel disputes within an agency directly connected to the White House.

The change would constitute a notable alteration in the architecture of federal employment protections, because it would relocate appeals from an entity designed to be independent to an office whose leadership answers to the president. The proposal therefore raises questions about the institutional separation between adjudicatory review and executive oversight.

At this stage, the plan is a proposal from OPM and would require the usual rulemaking and implementation steps before taking effect. The administration has presented the move as aligned with its broader effort to shrink the size of the federal government and implement personnel reforms consistent with that goal.


Summary

The Office of Personnel Management has proposed ending federal employees' ability to appeal firings to the Merit Systems Protection Board, instead directing such appeals to OPM, whose director reports to President Trump. The shift would transfer review authority from an independent board to an executive branch agency and fits with the administration's emphasis on reducing federal employment.

Risks

  • Reduction in independent review of dismissal decisions - could affect perceived impartiality of federal employment adjudications, with implications for public-sector morale and labor relations.
  • Consolidation of appeal authority within an agency that reports to the president - raises uncertainty about separation between executive oversight and adjudicatory functions in federal personnel matters.
  • Potential for broader workforce reductions given the administration's emphasis on mass layoffs as a key initiative - introduces uncertainty for agencies that employ large numbers of civilian workers.

More from Economy

USMCA Goods Largely Exempted From New 10% Global Tariff, But Review Threat Looms Feb 20, 2026 U.S. Trade Office to Open Broad Section 301 Reviews Covering Major Partners Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Term Spotlight: High-Stakes Cases Shaping Law and Policy Feb 20, 2026 Trump Vows Fresh 10% Global Tariff After Supreme Court Limits His Trade Authority Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Ruling Narrows Presidential Tariff Options, Treasury Secretary Says Feb 20, 2026