Currencies June 3, 2026 07:58 AM

Geneva Objects to U.S. Forced-Labour Findings, Braces for Higher Duties

Bern rejects USTR conclusions as Washington moves to restore emergency tariffs via 10% or 12.5% levies on imports from 60 economies

By Hana Yamamoto

The Swiss economy ministry dismissed conclusions from a U.S. probe into how countries handle imports made with forced labour, rejecting recommendations that Switzerland faces higher tariffs. The U.S. Trade Representative has proposed new duties of 10% or 12.5% on goods from 60 economies to address alleged failures to curb trade in forced-labour products; Switzerland has been singled out for a 12.5% rate. Swiss officials and industry groups say U.S. industry is not harmed by Swiss practices and expect any tariff differential to be manageable as negotiations on a bilateral accord continue.

Geneva Objects to U.S. Forced-Labour Findings, Braces for Higher Duties

Key Points

  • U.S. probe recommends new duties of 10% or 12.5% on imports from roughly 60 economies for failing to prevent trade in goods made with forced labour; Switzerland is recommended for a 12.5% rate while the EU would face 10%.
  • The Swiss economy ministry says U.S. industry is not harmed by Swiss practices and rejects the USTR conclusions; Swiss industry group economiesuisse called the forced-labour claim "completely unfounded."
  • Swiss officials expect the proposed 12.5% duties to replace separate 10% tariffs due to expire on July 24 and continue to pursue a long-term bilateral accord with the United States amid ongoing parallel probes about industrial capacity.

The Swiss government on Wednesday formally dismissed the findings of a U.S. investigation that assessed how a group of about 60 economies, including Switzerland, handle imports produced with forced labour. The probe led Washington to propose fresh import duties on goods from those countries.

The Trump administration has put forward a plan to levy additional tariffs of either 10% or 12.5% on imports from the 60 named economies after concluding that their shortcomings in stemming trade in goods made with forced labour are unreasonable and impede U.S. commerce. The move is presented by U.S. officials as a way to reinstate emergency tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump that a U.S. Supreme Court decision voided in February.

Switzerland’s economy ministry said in response that Swiss practices do not harm U.S. industry and therefore rejected the conclusions outlined by the U.S. Trade Representative, or USTR. According to the USTR’s recommendation, Switzerland and other countries that have not enacted an explicit import ban on goods produced with forced labour should face a 12.5% tariff, while members of the EU would be subject to a 10% rate.

Rudolf Minsch, chief economist at Swiss business lobby economiesuisse, characterised the forced labour allegation as "completely unfounded" and said the U.S. action was predictable given Washington’s desire to preserve tariffs that were set to expire. He added that Switzerland facing a marginally higher tariff than the EU looked manageable, noting the cost difference "could be passed on to customers or saved by using alternative routes."

On that point he said: "So from that point of view, it’s not decisive," and added, "It is perhaps simply somewhat annoying."

The economy ministry further indicated it expected the proposed 12.5% duties to replace separate 10% tariffs that are due to expire on July 24. That set of tariffs was distinct from the forced-labour probe and would be superseded if the new duties are imposed.

Separately, the forced-labour inquiry ran in parallel with another U.S. investigation which alleges certain countries - including Switzerland - operate excess industrial capacity to the detriment of U.S. industry. Switzerland rejects that allegation, but the ministry said it anticipated additional tariffs might follow from that investigation as well. The results of the industrial-capacity portion of the probe are expected in the coming weeks.

In developments from the prior year, President Trump imposed a 39% additional tariff on Swiss goods, the highest such level applied to any country in Europe. Switzerland reached an initial agreement with the United States in November that cut those tariffs, and Swiss officials have been engaged since then in efforts to formalise that deal.

The economy ministry said it is seeking a long-term bilateral accord to govern economic relations between Switzerland and the United States regardless of legal and political shifts within the U.S.


Summary

Switzerland has rejected U.S. findings from a probe into trade in goods made with forced labour and disputes the USTR’s recommendation that it be subject to a 12.5% tariff. Washington’s proposal to apply 10% or 12.5% duties to imports from about 60 economies aims to restore emergency tariffs that were overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in February. Swiss authorities and business representatives say U.S. industry is not harmed by Swiss rules, and Switzerland expects the tariff differential with the EU to be manageable as it pursues a formal bilateral agreement with the United States.

Risks

  • Additional tariffs could raise costs for exporters and importers involved in Swiss-U.S. trade, affecting sectors tied to cross-border goods flows.
  • An expected second set of tariffs from the parallel investigation into excess industrial capacity could further escalate trade tensions and uncertainty for manufacturing and industrial sectors.
  • Negotiations to formalise a bilateral agreement remain vulnerable to U.S. legal and political developments, creating ongoing regulatory uncertainty for businesses engaged in Swiss-U.S. commerce.

More from Currencies

Pound Inches Up as Dollar Pauses; Gains Remain Vulnerable Ahead of U.S. Payrolls Jun 4, 2026 Asian FX Firms After Sharp Losses as Dollar Holds Near Two-Month High Jun 4, 2026 Canadian dollar slides to eight-week low as trade and Gulf tensions pressure markets Jun 3, 2026 Yen Slides to 160 per Dollar as Gulf Tensions Propel Demand for U.S. Currency Jun 3, 2026 Pound Eases as Dollar Strength and Oil Rebound Pressure Risk Assets Jun 3, 2026