Commodities March 10, 2026

Oil tumbles more than 13% after U.S. president signals possible rapid de-escalation with Iran

Markets pare gains after earlier surge; supply risks and shipping disruptions keep upside threat intact

By Ajmal Hussain
Oil tumbles more than 13% after U.S. president signals possible rapid de-escalation with Iran

Oil prices reversed sharply on Tuesday, plunging over 13% after the prior session's spike to multi-year highs. Comments from U.S. President Donald Trump that the conflict with Iran could end quickly, plus an exchange with Russian President Vladimir Putin, eased immediate concerns about prolonged supply disruption and prompted a sell-off. Despite the drop, industry analysts warn that physical supply restoration would be slow if production has been shut in, and regional attacks and refinery outages continue to pose upside risks.

Key Points

  • Oil benchmarks fell more than 12% on Tuesday after comments suggesting the Iran conflict could end quickly eased fears of prolonged supply disruption, with Brent at $86.50 and WTI at $82.53 at 12:58 p.m. EDT (1658 GMT).
  • Physical supply restoration may be slow even if the war ends, as restarted output from shut-in wells can take weeks or longer; refinery and shipping disruptions are already impacting flows.
  • Policy actions under consideration - including easing Russian oil sanctions and releases from strategic reserves - plus coordination among G7 nations, have influenced market expectations but have not been executed.

Oil prices fell sharply on Tuesday as markets reacted to comments suggesting the Iran conflict might be resolved soon, cutting expectations of extended interruptions to global crude flows. At 12:58 p.m. EDT (1658 GMT), Brent futures were down $12.46, or 12.6%, at $86.50 a barrel, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude lost $12.24, or 12.9%, trading at $82.53.

Both benchmarks had rocketed to above $119 a barrel on Monday, reaching their highest points since June 2022 after Saudi Arabia and other producers trimmed supply and stoked fears of major shortages. Prices retreated late on Monday and again on Tuesday following reports that U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin had spoken and exchanged proposals aimed at a rapid settlement of the war, according to a Kremlin aide.

In a separate interview on CBS News aired on Monday, Trump said he believed the war against Iran was "very complete" and that Washington was "very far ahead" of his initial four- to five-week projected timeframe for the conflict. Those remarks contributed to a reassessment of how long any supply disruption might persist.

"Clearly Trump’s comments about a short-lived war have calmed markets. While there was an overreaction to the upside yesterday, we think there is an overreaction to the downside today," said Suvro Sarkar, energy sector team lead at DBS Bank.

Israel’s foreign minister added that Israel is not seeking an endless war with Iran and would coordinate with the United States on the timing to end the fighting.


Supply restoration will not be instantaneous, analysts warn

Even if the conflict were to end quickly, bringing oil supplies back to pre-conflict levels would not be immediate, Simon Flowers, chairman and chief analyst at Wood Mackenzie, cautioned. "When the conflict ends, cranking up the supply chain won’t be swift," he said. Flowers noted that while barrels in storage at refineries or in port could move relatively fast, wells that have been shut in for a prolonged period could take weeks or longer to resume full production.

On Tuesday, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps warned that Tehran would not allow "one litre of oil" to be exported from the region if U.S. and Israeli attacks continued, state media reported.

At the same time, reports emerged that the U.S. administration is weighing possible steps to alleviate global price pressure, including easing oil sanctions on Russia tied to the war in Ukraine and releasing emergency crude stockpiles, according to multiple sources.

"Discussions around easing sanctions on Russian oil, comments from Donald Trump hinting that the conflict could eventually de-escalate, and the possibility of G7 (Group of Seven) countries tapping strategic oil reserves all pointed to the same message - that oil barrels will somehow continue to reach the market," said Priyanka Sachdeva, an analyst at Phillip Nova.

G7 energy ministers on Tuesday did not agree to release strategic reserves; instead they requested the International Energy Agency assess the situation before taking action.


Conflict and regional disruptions continue to pose upside risk

Despite market moves that priced in a potential near-term de-escalation, the war continued to generate concrete disruptions. The U.S. and Israel carried out what both the Pentagon and on-the-ground Iranian sources described as the most intense airstrikes of the conflict on Tuesday, even as markets increasingly bet that President Trump would seek to curtail the fighting.

Saudi Aramco warned of "catastrophic consequences" for global oil markets if shipping through the Strait of Hormuz remained disrupted by the war. Consultancy IIR reported that nearly 1.9 million barrels per day of crude refining capacity in the Gulf has been shut in due to the U.S.-Israeli campaign against Iran.

JPMorgan, in a note, said policy measures could have limited impact on oil prices unless safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz is assured, given what it described as potential losses of up to 12 million barrels per day over the next two weeks.

Adding to supply-side concerns, Abu Dhabi state oil company ADNOC shut its Ruwais refinery after a fire broke out at a facility within the complex following a drone strike, a source said on Tuesday.

Given how fluid the situation remains, Goldman Sachs said it was not altering its oil price forecast, leaving Brent at $66 per barrel for the fourth quarter and WTI at $62 per barrel.


Market context and commentary

The rapid reversal from Monday’s surge to Tuesday’s steep drop underscores how sensitive oil markets are to signals about the trajectory of the Iran war and to policy options that could augment supply. Comments suggesting a shorter conflict or possible policy actions to boost crude availability led market participants to reassess near-term supply risks, prompting the dramatic sell-off.

At the same time, physical disruptions such as refinery outages, shut-in Gulf refining capacity, and threats to maritime routes mean the potential for renewed price spikes remains, should hostilities intensify or shipping routes be further threatened.


Promotional content noted in source:

The original report included a promotional segment about a product called ProPicks AI that evaluates stock 2222 alongside other companies. That segment stated ProPicks AI uses multiple financial metrics and AI to generate stock ideas and asked readers if they wanted to know whether 2222 is featured in any of its strategies.

This article focuses on oil market developments as described above and does not evaluate or endorse investment products.

Risks

  • Continued attacks and disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could cause renewed and substantial oil price spikes, affecting energy markets and global trade.
  • Shut-in refining capacity in the Gulf and damage to facilities, such as the Ruwais refinery fire, mean that even if fighting slows, output and processing could remain constrained for an extended period, impacting refining and petroleum product markets.
  • Policy measures such as sanctions relief or reserve releases may have limited price impact unless maritime routes are secured, creating uncertainty for oil-dependent industries and financial markets.

More from Commodities

U.S. Navy Declines Requests for Hormuz Escorts Citing High Attack Risk Mar 10, 2026 Kast Assumes Office as Commodity Shock Tests Chile’s Growth Agenda Mar 10, 2026 White House Says Recent Energy Price Spike Linked to Iran Will Be Temporary Mar 10, 2026 U.S. Requests Israel Stop Strikes on Iranian Energy Facilities Mar 10, 2026 Rising Pump Prices from Iran Conflict Threaten Republican Hold on Congress Mar 10, 2026