Commodities February 10, 2026

Carney Says U.S.-Canada Dispute Over Detroit-Windsor Bridge Will Be Resolved

Canadian financing and shared ownership at center of spat after U.S. president threatened to block opening

By Derek Hwang
Carney Says U.S.-Canada Dispute Over Detroit-Windsor Bridge Will Be Resolved

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters that a diplomatic disagreement over the $4.7 billion Gordie Howe International Bridge will be resolved after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to prevent the new crossing from opening. Carney said he discussed the bridge and other issues with Trump and emphasized that ownership is shared between Michigan and Canada despite Ottawa funding most of the construction.

Key Points

  • Canada financed the $4.7 billion Gordie Howe International Bridge after the U.S. declined to pay; repayment will come from tolls over 30 years - affects infrastructure financing and transport sectors.
  • Prime Minister Carney said ownership of the bridge is shared between the state of Michigan and the government of Canada, countering suggestions it would be solely Canadian-owned - impacts cross-border governance and legal arrangements.
  • U.S. president’s threat to bar the bridge opening prompted alarm from Michigan officials and business groups, who warn blocking the project would have significant regional economic consequences - relevant to regional economies and trade flows.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Tuesday that the disagreement with the United States over the new Detroit-Windsor crossing will be settled, following comments from U.S. President Donald Trump threatening to bar the bridge's opening.

Carney said he and Trump spoke on Tuesday morning about a variety of issues, including the bridge. "The situation will be settled," he told reporters, without offering further detail.

The dispute has arisen after the president warned he could block the new Gordie Howe International Bridge, a move that alarmed elected officials in Michigan. Trump pointed to several grievances in explaining his stance: Canada’s financing of the bridge, Ottawa’s refusal to stock some U.S. alcoholic beverages on Canadian store shelves, Canadian tariffs on dairy products, and Canada’s trade talks with China.

The bridge was financed by Canada after the United States declined to pay for it and carries a sticker price of $4.7 billion. It is scheduled to open in the coming months. The project’s construction costs were covered by Canada, and repayment of those costs is planned through toll revenues over a 30-year period.

"I explained that Canada, of course, paid for the construction of the bridge, over $4 billion. That the ownership is shared between the state of Michigan and the government of Canada," Carney said.

The president had suggested the bridge would be owned by Canada, a characterization Carney said was incorrect because legal ownership is shared between the state of Michigan and the government of Canada.

The White House did not immediately comment on Carney’s remarks.

Business groups in Michigan warned of the potential fallout. The Detroit Regional Chamber described the bridge as "the most consequential infrastructure project in the state and region of this generation," and cautioned that any effort to block the project would have "tremendous consequences for the region, state, and country."

In 2012, Michigan’s then-Governor Rick Snyder accepted an offer from the Canadian government to underwrite most of the bridge's costs and used executive authority to bypass the state legislature. Construction work on the crossing began in 2018.

On January 30, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security published a rule designating the bridge as an official port of entry. The rule said the new crossing will reduce congestion and travel time, easing traffic flows and saving travelers $12.7 million annually.


This dispute centers on financing, ownership perceptions, trade complaints and the political threat to impede the opening of a major cross-border transport link. Carney’s assurance that the matter will be resolved leaves unanswered specifics about how the concerns cited by the U.S. president will be addressed.

Risks

  • U.S. political action to block or impede the bridge's opening could disrupt regional transportation and commerce, affecting travel and cross-border trade - impacts transport and regional economic sectors.
  • Persistent trade grievances cited by the U.S. president, including tariffs and market access issues, could fuel further bilateral tensions that complicate infrastructure cooperation - affects trade-sensitive industries and policy stability.
  • Uncertainty about how the cited complaints will be resolved leaves outcomes unclear; Carney confirmed discussions but provided no details, meaning diplomatic negotiations may be protracted - affects investor and stakeholder confidence in cross-border projects.

More from Commodities

Cuba Turns to Solar as Fuel Supplies and Power Grid Strain Under U.S. Measures Feb 20, 2026 Citigroup Maps Out Oil Price Paths as U.S.-Iran Tensions Mount Feb 20, 2026 Oil Rises, Tech and Credit Nervous as Geopolitics and AI Spending Reshape Markets Feb 20, 2026 EPA to Roll Back Mercury and Air Toxics Limits on Coal Plants, Citing Grid Reliability Feb 20, 2026 Raymond James: U.S. Military Action in Iran 'Likely at This Stage' as Tensions Rise Feb 20, 2026