Analyst Ratings February 9, 2026

William Blair Sticks With Outperform on Northern Oil and Gas; Analysts Trim Forecasts Amid Strategic Shifts

Firm expects steady near-term results, sees 2026 production upside after planned capex increase; dividend intact and Ohio Utica stake expands footprint

By Derek Hwang NOG
William Blair Sticks With Outperform on Northern Oil and Gas; Analysts Trim Forecasts Amid Strategic Shifts
NOG

William Blair reaffirmed an Outperform rating on Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE: NOG), projecting stable fourth-quarter 2025 results and a 2026 production ramp tied to higher early-year capital spending. The company’s recent Ohio Utica Shale acquisition, larger hedging positions and a 7% dividend yield factor into analyst views even as several firms cut near-term earnings estimates and peer leverage remains elevated.

Key Points

  • William Blair reiterated an Outperform rating and expects Q4 2025 results to be similar to the prior quarter, with production and capex steady - impacts energy and equity markets.
  • The firm forecasts higher capex early in 2026 leading to significant production growth in the second half of 2026 - influences oil and gas supply dynamics and company-level returns.
  • Northern Oil and Gas completed a 49% Ohio Utica Shale acquisition for $588 million in cash as part of a $1.2 billion deal and has boosted 2026-2027 natural gas hedges - affects natural gas exposure and cash flow visibility.

William Blair has maintained an Outperform rating on Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE: NOG), according to a research note released Monday. The research house expects the company’s fourth quarter 2025 results to look much like the prior quarter, with production and capital expenditures holding relatively steady.

Investors will have a near-term opportunity to confirm those expectations: Northern Oil and Gas is scheduled to report earnings on February 25, just 16 days away.

Looking beyond the immediate quarter, William Blair projects a different trajectory in 2026. The firm forecasts higher capital spending early in the year, which it says should translate into sizable production gains in the second half of 2026.

Those projections arrive against a backdrop of downward revisions from some market participants. InvestingPro data shows that eight analysts have recently lowered their earnings estimates for upcoming periods, signaling caution among parts of the sellside.

William Blair also weighed in on Northern Oil and Gas’s acquisition approach. The firm expects the company to continue pursuing a "ground-game" acquisition strategy, but it believes management will exercise discipline when evaluating deals. That caution is framed by peer leverage that William Blair characterizes as above average, and by Northern Oil and Gas’s own balance sheet metrics, including a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.05 and total debt of $2.35 billion.

InvestingPro’s Fair Value assessment indicates the stock is currently trading below intrinsic value, a view that supports the Outperform stance even as leverage and valuation dynamics constrain deal activity.

On the shareholder return front, William Blair does not anticipate any change to Northern Oil and Gas’s quarterly dividend. The company currently yields roughly 7%; InvestingPro pins the precise dividend yield at 7.02% and notes that the firm has increased its dividend for five consecutive years.

Corporate actions and hedging updates have been notable. Northern Oil and Gas announced a definitive agreement to acquire a 49% interest in Ohio Utica Shale assets for $588 million in cash, part of a larger $1.2 billion transaction. The assets include approximately 35,000 net acres and more than 100 gross identified undeveloped drilling locations.

Following that transaction, Northern Oil and Gas materially increased its natural gas hedging positions. The company’s hedge volumes for 2026 and 2027 now cover a substantial portion of its projected natural gas production, a move that affects near- and medium-term cash flow visibility.

Market analysts have adjusted their price targets and ratings in light of commodity pricing and differential shifts. Raymond James trimmed its price target for Northern Oil and Gas to $32.00 from $33.00 but maintained a Strong Buy rating, citing weaker commodity strip prices. Mizuho lowered its price target to $29.00 from $30.00 and kept a Neutral rating, pointing to wider natural gas differentials and forecasting some stabilization in company activity by 2026 after projects were deferred in 2025 amid lower oil prices.

Together, these analyst moves and the company’s recent transactions reflect a period of strategic recalibration for Northern Oil and Gas as it balances growth spending, deal discipline and shareholder returns amid market headwinds.


Key context and metrics

  • Northern Oil and Gas has been profitable over the last twelve months with a price-to-earnings ratio of 14.06, per InvestingPro data.
  • Analysts’ consensus recommendation sits at 2.18, which corresponds to a Buy rating on average across coverage.
  • Company balance sheet: debt-to-equity ratio of 1.05 and total debt of $2.35 billion.

What to watch next

  • Quarterly results due February 25 will provide confirmation of William Blair’s view that Q4 2025 will closely resemble the previous quarter.
  • Execution on early-2026 capital spending and the timing of production increases in H2 2026 will be key to validating the firm’s longer-term forecast.
  • Integration and performance of the Ohio Utica Shale assets, plus the impact of expanded gas hedges on realized prices and cash flow.

Risks

  • Elevated leverage: NOG’s debt-to-equity ratio of 1.05 and $2.35 billion of total debt increase balance sheet risk for the company and can pressure energy sector valuations.
  • Commodity and differential pressure: Weaker commodity strip prices and wider natural gas differentials have already prompted analysts to cut price targets and may continue to impact earnings for oil and gas producers.
  • Execution and timing uncertainty: Increased capex early in 2026 is projected to drive production gains in H2 2026, but deferred projects in 2025 and recent analyst downgrades highlight uncertainty in project execution and timing.

More from Analyst Ratings

HSBC Lowers Synopsys Rating to Hold, Flags 2026 as Transition Year Feb 21, 2026 DA Davidson Cuts Uber Price Target Citing Elevated Investment; Buy Rating Intact Feb 20, 2026 Freedom Capital Markets Raises Freeport-McMoRan to Buy, Cites Copper Supply Tightness Feb 20, 2026 BofA Lifts CF Industries Price Target After Strong Q4 EBITDA; Maintains Underperform Rating Feb 20, 2026 Truist Lifts Tandem Diabetes Price Target as Company Shifts Toward Pharmacy Model Feb 20, 2026