Analyst Ratings February 13, 2026

Piper Sandler Lowers US Foods Rating to Neutral, Cites Rich Valuation

Firm raises price target after Q4 results but says elevated valuation and recent rally limit upside

By Jordan Park USFD
Piper Sandler Lowers US Foods Rating to Neutral, Cites Rich Valuation
USFD

Piper Sandler cut its rating on US Foods (NYSE:USFD) from Overweight to Neutral while increasing its price target to $103.00 from $85.00 after the company reported fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results and updated fiscal 2026 guidance. The brokerage said the move reflects valuation pressures rather than a negative view of the company’s long-term prospects, and pointed to a high trailing P/E and technical indicators following a recent share-price rally.

Key Points

  • Piper Sandler downgraded US Foods (NYSE:USFD) from Overweight to Neutral while raising its price target to $103.00 from $85.00.
  • The firm cited valuation concerns and technical indicators - including a trailing P/E of 30.59 and an RSI signaling overbought conditions after a 12.9% weekly gain - as drivers of the downgrade.
  • US Foods reported adjusted EPS of $1.04 for Q4 fiscal 2025, beating the $1.01 estimate, while revenue of $9.8 billion missed forecasts of $9.94 billion by 1.41%; a US Foods-Lexington unit won a $603 million Defense Logistics Agency contract after a three-bid competitive process.

Overview

Piper Sandler revised its stance on US Foods Holding Corp, moving the stock from Overweight to Neutral on Friday. At the same time, the firm lifted its 12-month price target to $103.00 from $85.00, a level that sits just above US Foods’ most recent trading price of $101.98 and very near its 52-week high of $102.13.

Valuation and technical signals cited

The research house framed the rating change as a "valuation driven and Risk-Reward based decision" rather than a critique of the company’s strategic trajectory. Piper Sandler pointed to InvestingPro data showing US Foods trading at a price-to-earnings ratio of 30.59, and noted that relative strength index readings imply the shares are in overbought territory after a 12.9% jump in the prior week. Those factors underpinned the brokerage’s conclusion that the current risk-reward profile no longer supported an Overweight recommendation.

Modeling constraints

Even after the firm incorporated its initial fiscal year 2028 estimates and pushed forward its long-term valuation framework sooner than it typically would, Piper Sandler said it was unable to justify extending its model assumptions further. That modeling limit contributed to the decision to downgrade the stock while simultaneously increasing the one-year target price.

Management and recent results

Piper Sandler’s note made clear the downgrade does not reflect a negative view of management, which the firm described as "excellent." The timing of the rating change followed US Foods’ release of fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results and an update to guidance for fiscal year 2026.

In its fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 report, US Foods posted adjusted earnings per share of $1.04, outpacing the consensus estimate of $1.01 by 2.97%. Revenue for the quarter was $9.8 billion, which missed the expected $9.94 billion by 1.41%.

Contract win highlights ongoing business activity

Separately, a US Foods branch in Lexington, South Carolina, secured a $603 million contract to supply food and beverage products to U.S. military services. The contract was awarded by the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support in Philadelphia following a competitive bidding process that drew three bids.


Contextual note

The downgrade reflects a balancing of updated financial estimates, technical market signals, and valuation metrics. Piper Sandler’s assessment emphasises that while operational performance and management quality remain positive, the share price and valuation metrics constrain the firm’s recommendation.

Risks

  • Valuation risk: Elevated P/E and recent sharp share-price appreciation may limit near-term upside and raise the potential for downside if sentiment shifts - impacts equity investors and market analysts.
  • Earnings versus revenue divergence: While adjusted EPS beat estimates, revenue missed expectations, introducing uncertainty around top-line momentum and its implications for foodservice sector investors.
  • Concentration of contract awards: Although the $603 million Defense Logistics Agency award signals commercial traction, reliance on competitive contract outcomes introduces contract execution and renewal risk for the foodservice supply segment.

More from Analyst Ratings

HSBC Lowers Synopsys Rating to Hold, Flags 2026 as Transition Year Feb 21, 2026 DA Davidson Cuts Uber Price Target Citing Elevated Investment; Buy Rating Intact Feb 20, 2026 Freedom Capital Markets Raises Freeport-McMoRan to Buy, Cites Copper Supply Tightness Feb 20, 2026 BofA Lifts CF Industries Price Target After Strong Q4 EBITDA; Maintains Underperform Rating Feb 20, 2026 Truist Lifts Tandem Diabetes Price Target as Company Shifts Toward Pharmacy Model Feb 20, 2026