Analyst Ratings February 3, 2026

GLJ Research Lowers Daqo New Energy to Sell, Sets $18.13 Target

Analyst flags Chinese polysilicon supply-demand uncertainty as company faces steep near-term margin and revenue pressures

By Avery Klein DQ
GLJ Research Lowers Daqo New Energy to Sell, Sets $18.13 Target
DQ

GLJ Research cut its rating on Daqo New Energy (NYSE: DQ) from Buy to Sell and assigned a new price target of $18.13, reflecting a material downside from recent levels. The downgrade cites uncertainty in China’s polysilicon supply-and-demand balance and regulatory execution, while company-level metrics show a projected revenue decline and deeply negative gross margins. Separately, Xinjiang Daqo forecasts a narrowing of losses in fiscal 2025 compared with 2024.

Key Points

  • GLJ Research downgraded Daqo New Energy (NYSE: DQ) from Buy to Sell and set a new price target of $18.13 per share, implying about a 26% downside from Monday’s close.
  • Market and company data show pressure: shares fell 10.14% in the past week, Price/Book is 0.38, projected revenue decline of 30% this year, and gross profit margins at -34.2%.
  • Policy and market dynamics in China’s polysilicon sector are central - GLJ highlighted uneven execution of the government’s anti-involution supply-reduction measures and signaled that forward prices reflect regulatory shifts observed in January.

GLJ Research downgraded Daqo New Energy (NYSE: DQ) from Buy to Sell on Tuesday, assigning a new price target of $18.13 per share. The research note states the revised target implies roughly a 26% downside from Monday's closing price.

The move comes as the shares have already slipped in recent trading, falling 10.14% over the past week. InvestingPro data cited alongside the research note shows Daqo trading at a Price/Book ratio of 0.38.

GLJ Research analyst Gordon Johnson pointed to growing concerns about China’s polysilicon supply and demand dynamics as a central reason for the rating change. The note highlighted that China’s stated policy to trim excess polysilicon capacity - described by GLJ as an ‘anti-involution’ strategy - has shown uneven execution despite official rhetoric.

The research firm also said polysilicon forward prices appear to reflect the market impact of what it characterized as Beijing’s retreat from that anti-involution campaign, citing regulatory activity observed in January as the basis for that view.

Company-level metrics referenced in the note and related data underscore the headwinds. InvestingPro information indicates Daqo faces a projected revenue decline of approximately 30% in the current year, with gross profit margins already reported at negative 34.2%.

Despite the downgrade, InvestingPro analysis cited in the material suggests that Daqo may be undervalued according to its Fair Value model. The platform also offers additional ProTips for subscribers analyzing Daqo’s financials, noting 12 further tips are available.


In separate corporate disclosures, Daqo New Energy said its unit Xinjiang Daqo New Energy expects to narrow its net loss in fiscal 2025. Xinjiang Daqo forecasts net losses between RMB1.0 billion and RMB1.3 billion for fiscal 2025, an improvement from the RMB2.7 billion net loss reported for fiscal 2024. That projection was published as a preliminary estimate to the Shanghai Stock Exchange.

Daqo New Energy holds roughly 72.8% of Xinjiang Daqo’s equity, according to the information provided in the announcement.

The combination of the analyst downgrade, weak near-term operating metrics, and policy-related uncertainty in China’s polysilicon market forms the current backdrop for investor reassessment of Daqo’s outlook and valuation.

Risks

  • Execution risk on China’s anti-involution policy - GLJ notes implementation has been uneven, which could prolong supply imbalances in the polysilicon market and affect prices and producer margins.
  • Near-term financial strain at the company level - InvestingPro data points to a projected 30% revenue decline and gross margins at negative 34.2%, creating earnings and cash-flow pressure.
  • Regulatory and pricing uncertainty - GLJ’s view that polysilicon forward prices are pricing in a rollback of supply-control measures introduces uncertainty for producers and downstream solar manufacturers.

More from Analyst Ratings

B. Riley Starts Coverage on Angel Studios, Issues Buy Rating and $7 Target Feb 25, 2026 Raymond James Sticks With Strong Buy on American Tower After Q4 Beat and Updated Guidance Feb 25, 2026 UBS Moves IBM to Neutral, Citing More Balanced Risk-Reward After Recent Weakness Feb 25, 2026 KeyBanc Lowers Evolent Health Rating Citing Rising Leverage and Soft 2026 Guidance Feb 25, 2026 Raymond James Cuts FIS Price Target After Margin Shortfall; Shares Near 52-Week Low Feb 24, 2026