Analyst Ratings February 13, 2026

Craig-Hallum Lowers SPS Commerce to Hold, Cuts Price Target to $70 as Outlook Worries Persist

Analyst flags acquisition execution, delayed enablement campaigns and AI risk after quarter that beat EPS but missed revenue estimates

By Ajmal Hussain SPSC
Craig-Hallum Lowers SPS Commerce to Hold, Cuts Price Target to $70 as Outlook Worries Persist
SPSC

Craig-Hallum downgraded SPS Commerce from Buy to Hold and trimmed its target to $70, citing acquisition underperformance, a subdued 2026 outlook and delays to planned enablement activities. The firm also raised concerns that artificial intelligence could exert downside pressure despite management’s positives. The move follows a quarter with an EPS beat but a slight revenue shortfall.

Key Points

  • Craig-Hallum downgraded SPS Commerce from Buy to Hold and cut its price target to $70 (Financial markets, Stocks).
  • The stock was trading at $65.67 and is far below its 52-week high of $154.76, marking a 56.4% decline over the last year (Equity markets).
  • Q4 2025 EPS beat estimates at $1.14 versus $1.01, a 12.87% surprise, while revenue of $192.7 million missed the $193.6 million expectation (Corporate earnings, Financial markets).

Craig-Hallum on Friday reduced its rating on SPS Commerce from Buy to Hold and lowered the firm’s price objective to $70. The research note came as the shares trade near $65.67, a level well below the stock’s 52-week high of $154.76 and reflecting a 56.4% decline over the past year.

The downgrade follows recent financial disclosures and forward guidance from the company. Craig-Hallum pointed to a quarterly revenue result that sat at the low end of the company’s guidance range and to a 2026 outlook that fell slightly short of Wall Street expectations as material drivers of the change in stance.

In its commentary, the research firm highlighted concerns about SPS Commerce’s acquisitions in 2024 and 2025 of revenue recovery companies, saying those moves "do not appear to have panned out thus far." The firm identified those transactions as contributors to a weaker outlook than analysts had anticipated.

Craig-Hallum also noted that enablement campaigns the company originally expected to run in early 2026 have been delayed into later in the year, creating what the analyst described as "considerable uncertainty" about the causes of this "very unusual behavior." The research note added that worries around artificial intelligence and its potential negative impact on the company could outweigh the "broad range of positives laid out by management."

Separately, SPS Commerce reported fourth-quarter 2025 results showing an earnings per share (EPS) of $1.14, ahead of the $1.01 consensus estimate and representing a 12.87% EPS surprise. Revenue for the quarter totaled $192.7 million, marginally below the anticipated $193.6 million. While the EPS outperformance was notable, the revenue shortfall contributed to a cautious market reception.

Taken together, the downgrade, the trimmed price target and the mixed quarterly metrics underscore investor focus on execution of recent strategic moves and clarity on timing for planned customer enablement efforts. The analyst note suggests that until those execution questions are resolved, skepticism among some sell-side researchers may persist.


Implications

The move by Craig-Hallum reframes the near-term narrative around SPS Commerce from growth acceleration to execution risk, reinforcing market attention on upcoming operational milestones and guidance updates.

Risks

  • Acquisitions completed in 2024 and 2025 of revenue recovery companies "do not appear to have panned out thus far," which could continue to weigh on performance (Technology and software sector).
  • Planned enablement campaigns originally expected in early 2026 have been pushed later, creating "considerable uncertainty" about drivers of the company’s recent performance (Customer adoption and go-to-market execution risk).
  • Analyst concern that artificial intelligence could have a negative impact on the company, potentially overshadowing management’s stated positives (Technology sector and market sentiment).

More from Analyst Ratings

HSBC Lowers Synopsys Rating to Hold, Flags 2026 as Transition Year Feb 21, 2026 DA Davidson Cuts Uber Price Target Citing Elevated Investment; Buy Rating Intact Feb 20, 2026 Freedom Capital Markets Raises Freeport-McMoRan to Buy, Cites Copper Supply Tightness Feb 20, 2026 BofA Lifts CF Industries Price Target After Strong Q4 EBITDA; Maintains Underperform Rating Feb 20, 2026 Truist Lifts Tandem Diabetes Price Target as Company Shifts Toward Pharmacy Model Feb 20, 2026