World April 21, 2026 04:17 PM

SPLC Says Federal Probe Targets Its Use of Paid Informants, Denies Wrongdoing

Civil rights group says Justice Department is examining its past intelligence-gathering from confidential sources amid criticism from Trump administration allies

By Sofia Navarro
SPLC Says Federal Probe Targets Its Use of Paid Informants, Denies Wrongdoing

The Southern Poverty Law Center said it is the subject of a criminal investigation by the Department of Justice related to its historical use of paid confidential informants to collect intelligence on violent extremist groups. CEO Bryan Fair said the organization shared information with law enforcement but concealed its use of paid sources to protect those informants. The move follows criticism from Trump administration officials and the termination of a working relationship with the FBI.

Key Points

  • SPLC says the Justice Department is conducting a criminal investigation focused on its past use of paid confidential informants to gather intelligence on violent extremist groups - sectors impacted include civil society and legal services.
  • CEO Bryan Fair stated the SPLC shared informant-derived intelligence with local and federal law enforcement but concealed informant identities to protect their safety - this affects law enforcement collaboration and nonprofit operational practices.
  • FBI Director Kash Patel ended a long-running relationship between the FBI and the SPLC, calling the group a "partisan smear machine"; that action followed the assassination of Charlie Kirk and concerns from conservative actors - this has implications for federal-nonprofit partnerships and public trust.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a civil rights organization known for monitoring extremist movements, announced on Tuesday that it is facing a criminal probe and potential charges from the Department of Justice connected to its prior employment of paid informants.

In a recorded video statement, CEO Bryan Fair said the apparent focus of the investigation is "on the SPLC’s prior use of paid confidential informants to gather credible intelligence on extremely violent groups." Fair argued that the use of paid informants was a protective measure, intended to shield SPLC staff from threats of violence.

Fair said the organization routinely provided information obtained from paid sources to local and federal law enforcement agencies. He added that the SPLC did not broadly disclose its reliance on paid informants because doing so could endanger the informants and their families.

Officials aligned with the Trump administration and some conservative voices have criticized the Alabama-based SPLC for labeling certain far-right organizations as hate groups. That debate intensified after the FBI, under Director Kash Patel, ended a yearslong working relationship with the SPLC in October. Patel characterized the group as a "partisan smear machine" that he said had been used to defame individuals and incite violence.

Patel’s decision to sever ties with the SPLC occurred weeks after the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk. Kirk’s conservative youth group, Turning Point USA, had been listed on the SPLC’s "Hate Map" and described by the organization as an anti-government group.

An SPLC spokesperson declined to comment beyond CEO Fair’s recorded remarks. The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The SPLC traces its origins to the early 1970s, when it was established to defend the legal rights of Black Americans in the wake of civil rights reforms of the 1960s. The organization has said it played a role in securing convictions of members of white supremacist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan.

In the video, Fair framed the investigation as part of a broader pattern, saying, "Today, the federal government has been weaponized to dismantle the rights of our nation’s most vulnerable people and any organization like ours that stands in the breach." He added that the SPLC would not be intimidated into silence or abandon its mission or the communities it serves.


Context and implications

The SPLC’s statement highlights a clash between a civil rights monitoring group and federal authorities aligned with the prior administration. The organization insists its use of paid informants was a legitimate tool for documenting and responding to violent extremist threats, and that concealment of informant identities was necessary for safety.

The formal scope of the Justice Department inquiry and whether it will result in charges remains unclear based on statements available publicly. The SPLC has signaled it will resist any effort it views as politically motivated, while Justice Department officials have not provided a public response to inquiries.

Risks

  • Potential criminal charges against the SPLC related to its use of paid informants create legal risk for the organization and could disrupt its operations - this affects the nonprofit and legal sectors.
  • Disclosure of informant use could endanger current or former informants and their families if protections fail, presenting personal safety risks and operational uncertainties for organizations that use confidential sources - this impacts civil rights groups and law enforcement cooperation.
  • The public dispute and severed relationship with the FBI raise uncertainty about information-sharing between advocacy groups and federal agencies, potentially weakening collaborative efforts to monitor violent extremist threats - this affects law enforcement and public safety coordination.

More from World

El Salvador Begins Mass Trial of 486 Alleged MS-13 Leaders Accused in Over 47,000 Crimes Apr 21, 2026 Disappearances Rise in Mexico as Attacks on Rights Defenders Persist, Amnesty Reports Apr 21, 2026 Paraguay Central Bank Keeps Policy Rate at 5.5% Citing Stable Inflation Outlook Apr 21, 2026 U.S. Targets Network Said to Help Replenish Iran’s Missile Stocks with New Sanctions Apr 21, 2026 Peru's Electoral Chief Steps Down as Vote Count Stalls and Contested Ballots Are Reviewed Apr 21, 2026