Nissan Motor Co. has revised its operating forecast for the fiscal year ending March 2026, saying it now expects an operating profit of ¥50 billion rather than the earlier forecast of a ¥60 billion operating loss. The change was announced after markets closed on April 27.
The company cited three drivers for the improved outlook: a reversal of provisions related to U.S. greenhouse gas (GHG) regulations, cost reductions and favourable movements in foreign exchange rates. Nissan indicated the one-off reversal tied to the U.S. GHG regulations appears to be the principal contributor to the shift from a loss to a profit.
Nissan said it will provide a full breakdown of the items behind the revised forecast when it releases its results on May 13. That disclosure is expected to clarify the relative weight of the one-time provision reversal versus ongoing operational improvements such as cost cuts and FX effects.
Market commentary followed the announcement. Citi noted that it had earlier modelled a one-time GHG-related impact of ¥50 billion and had expected Nissan to record an operating loss of ¥10 billion for the period. Citi observed that the actual one-time impact may have exceeded its prior assumptions, a comment that underscores uncertainty about the precise size and accounting treatment of the reversal.
The company’s move to upgrade its forecast reflects an interplay of a material one-off accounting adjustment and management actions on costs, with currency movements providing additional support. Nissan’s May 13 results presentation will be the next scheduled opportunity for investors and analysts to see the underlying numbers and the company’s detailed explanation of the drivers.
Context and next steps
With the results announcement scheduled for May 13, market participants will be looking for the detailed line-item disclosure that explains how much of the forecast improvement is attributable to the U.S. GHG provision reversal versus recurring items such as cost reductions or FX gains. Citi’s comment that the one-time impact may have been larger than expected highlights a key area of near-term uncertainty.