Stock Markets May 15, 2026 07:13 AM

Barclays Heat Map Suggests UK Energy Shock May Echo 2011, Not 2022

Bank adapts ECB framework to plot supply-demand indicators and inflation persistence using standardized z-scores

By Caleb Monroe

Barclays has produced a heat map comparing current UK economic indicators against past major energy shocks and concludes that second-round effects from the present energy price shock are likely to be closer to the pattern seen in 2011 than the persistent inflationary outcome observed in 2022. The bank adapted recent work from the European Central Bank to construct a standardized, z-score based framework that maps supply and demand measures and their directional influence on inflation and inflation persistence.

Barclays Heat Map Suggests UK Energy Shock May Echo 2011, Not 2022

Key Points

  • Barclays created a heat map comparing current UK economic indicators with those from previous major energy shocks to assess potential second-round inflation effects.
  • The bank's analysis suggests current second-round effects may more closely resemble 2011 - which displayed limited follow-on inflation - rather than the more persistent inflation seen in 2022.
  • Barclays adapted an ECB analytical framework, standardizing measures into z-scores and plotting them with color-coding to show above- and below-average conditions and directional impacts on inflation persistence. Sectors affected include energy, consumer prices, and broader economic activity which influence market and policy considerations.

Barclays has built a comparative heat map that places current UK economic indicators alongside those recorded during previous major energy shocks, and reports that the likely second-round effects of the current energy price shock appear more similar to the 2011 episode than to the more inflation-persistent 2022 episode.

The bank emphasized that the wider economic backdrop around an energy shock matters for how the shock propagates through the economy and for how long its effects last. There remains active debate about whether the current pattern will align with the 2011 experience - which showed limited second-round effects - or with 2022, when the inflationary impulse proved more durable.

To bring clarity to that comparison, Barclays adapted recent analytical work produced by the European Central Bank and tailored it to the UK context. The output is a heat map intended to offer a structured way to assess how a set of core supply and demand indicators might shape the inflation response to the current energy shock.

Methodologically, the bank standardized each indicator by converting values into z-scores relative to each series long-term mean. Those standardized measures are then plotted according to their relative z-score for the relevant periods. On the visualization, green denotes periods where conditions are above average and blue denotes periods where they are below average. For certain series the orientation was inverted so that green highlights periods when the directional effect on inflation and inflation persistence is positive, and blue shows the converse.

The analysis therefore combines a selection of supply and demand gauges with a consistent standardization approach to facilitate cross-period comparison. By mapping indicators in this way, Barclays presents a framework to weigh how current conditions compare to prior shocks and to infer whether second-round inflationary pressures are likely to be limited or persistent.


Because the work adapts the ECB framework specifically for the UK, the bank treats the map as a tool for interpreting the balance of pressures that can influence inflation dynamics - rather than as a definitive forecast. The comparison to 2011 and 2022 is presented as a judgment based on the plotted indicator patterns and the chosen standardization method.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over which historical episode the current situation most closely follows - 2011 or 2022 - leaves the persistence of inflation outcomes unclear, affecting sectors sensitive to price stability such as consumer goods and energy.
  • Interpretation depends on the chosen indicators and the z-score standardization method; methodological choices can influence the visual comparison and the resulting assessment, with implications for market participants and policymakers.
  • The heat map is a comparative diagnostic tool rather than a deterministic forecast, so reliance on its output without acknowledging its analytical limitations could mislead economic or market decision-making.

More from Stock Markets

Gemini Shares Jump After Founders Inject $100 Million in Bitcoin at Discounted Price May 15, 2026 UBS Says Fraport Valuation Now More Reflective of Fundamentals After Market Drop May 15, 2026 Trump Says Taiwan Arms Sales Were Raised With Xi; Decision Expected Soon May 15, 2026 Datavault AI Posts 443% Q1 Revenue Gain, Keeps $200M Full-Year Goal May 15, 2026 Figma Rallies After Strong Q1 Results and Upsized Guidance May 15, 2026