World February 19, 2026

Inside Trump’s 'Board of Peace': Structure, Membership and Global Responses

First meeting convenes amid praise from supporters and criticism over its mandate, membership and relationship with the United Nations

By Sofia Navarro
Inside Trump’s 'Board of Peace': Structure, Membership and Global Responses

The United States plans to hold the inaugural meeting of the so-called Board of Peace, an international body proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump to oversee the temporary administration and redevelopment of Gaza and potentially other conflict zones. The initiative, chaired by Trump, has attracted more than two dozen founding member states but has also prompted objections from key Western allies, major global powers and rights groups who question its mandate, composition and the absence of Palestinian representation.

Key Points

  • The Board of Peace was proposed by President Trump to administer Gaza temporarily and potentially address other global conflicts, with Trump as its chair - impacts diplomacy and international governance.
  • Membership rules limit most countries to three-year terms unless they pay $1 billion to secure permanent status - affects funding flows for reconstruction and international aid financing.
  • The U.N. Security Council passed a U.S.-drafted resolution recognizing the board for a Gaza-specific mandate through 2027 and authorized a temporary stabilization force, while China and Russia abstained - relevant to international security and multilateral institutions.

U.S. President Donald Trump will chair the first convening of his newly created "Board of Peace," a body he proposed last September as part of a plan to end the conflict in Gaza. The board was initially presented as a mechanism to administer Gaza on a temporary basis and coordinate reconstruction, but Trump has indicated its remit could expand beyond Gaza to address other conflicts worldwide.

The board's charter sets out membership rules that limit most members to three-year terms, while allowing countries that contribute at least $1 billion each to fund the board's activities to obtain permanent status. The White House announced an initial executive lineup in January that included U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff, former British prime minister Tony Blair and Jared Kushner as members of the founding Executive Board.


Membership and who has signed up

The board's official account on X has published a list of more than two dozen founding member countries. The roster includes several of Washington's principal Middle Eastern partners: Israel and Saudi Arabia, along with Egypt and Qatar, the latter two of which played mediation roles in ceasefire discussions between Israel and Hamas. Other Middle Eastern states listed as founding members are Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.

Outside the region, the list includes Albania, Argentina, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Cambodia, El Salvador, Hungary, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Mongolia, Pakistan, Paraguay, Uzbekistan and Vietnam.


Notable absences

Several significant Western allies and major Global South powers declined to join. Leaders from Britain, the European Union, France, Germany, Norway and Sweden have said they will not be members. Brazil, India, Mexico and South Africa also have not accepted offers to join.

An invitation to Canada was rescinded last month after President Trump objected to a speech by Prime Minister Mark Carney in Davos. Brazil and Mexico explicitly cited the absence of Palestinian representation on the board as a reason for refusing to participate. The Vatican likewise chose not to join, maintaining that crisis response efforts should remain under United Nations management. China and Russia, both permanent members of the U.N. Security Council with veto power, have not joined the initiative.


Powers envisaged for the board and U.N. engagement

The U.N. Security Council adopted a U.S.-drafted resolution in November that recognized the board and welcomed it as a transitional and temporary administration that would establish the framework and coordinate funding for Gaza's redevelopment under the U.S. plan. The resolution authorized the board to field a temporary International Stabilization Force in Gaza, while specifying that the board's mandate in Gaza would run only through 2027.

That Security Council resolution requires the board to report its progress to the council every six months. China and Russia abstained on the resolution, saying it did not clarify the U.N.'s future role in Gaza. Beyond the limited Gaza mandate spelled out by the council, the board's legal authority, enforcement tools and the precise modalities for cooperation with the U.N. and other international organizations remain unclear.

According to the board's charter, it will undertake "peace-building functions in accordance with international law." The charter also grants its chairman, President Trump, wide executive powers, including the ability to veto board decisions and to remove members, subject to certain constraints specified in the charter.


Criticism and human rights concerns

The board has drawn vocal criticism from human rights experts and other observers. Critics say the structure - with an external body overseeing a territory devastated by conflict - evokes colonial arrangements, particularly given that the board does not include a Palestinian representative while it is intended to supervise temporary governance of Palestinian territory.

Observers have also highlighted the inclusion of Tony Blair on the founding executive body, citing his past role in the Iraq war and criticisms linked to British actions in the Middle East. The composition of the board has been questioned for including countries whose human rights records have been criticized by rights groups - examples cited by critics in public commentary include several Middle Eastern states as well as Belarus and El Salvador.

There has been pointed controversy over Israel's membership on a board charged with overseeing Gaza's temporary administration. Critics note that Gaza was left devastated by a recent Israeli military campaign that resulted in tens of thousands of deaths, a severe hunger crisis, mass internal displacement and allegations of war crimes and genocide. Israel has defended its actions as self-defense after a Hamas-led attack in 2023 that killed 1,200 people and resulted in the capture of more than 250 hostages.


Who will attend the first meeting

Officials say nearly all nations that have joined the board are expected to attend the inaugural session. In addition, a senior U.S. official confirmed that more than 20 countries will participate as observers. The observer list named by U.S. officials includes close Asian partners Japan and South Korea, as well as India and Thailand.

Observers from Europe and other regions will include Britain and the European Union, and individual states such as Austria, Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. Norway and Switzerland have said they will participate in observer roles, as will Mexico and Oman.

Agenda items for the meeting are expected to focus on Gaza's reconstruction, the coordination of humanitarian assistance and plans for the deployment of a stabilization force.

Risks

  • Questions about the board's legitimacy and overlap with U.N. authority could complicate coordination of reconstruction and humanitarian assistance in Gaza - affecting humanitarian agencies and reconstruction contractors.
  • Absence of Palestinian representation and inclusion of parties criticized for human rights records risk undermining perceptions of impartiality and may provoke diplomatic pushback from non-participating states - influencing diplomatic relations and international aid partnerships.
  • Unclear legal authority and enforcement mechanisms beyond Gaza create uncertainty about the board's ability to operate in other conflicts, limiting its practical impact on peace-building and stabilization efforts - relevant to defense contractors and international peacekeeping planners.

More from World

Congress Poised to Vote on Curtailing President’s Authority to Strike Iran as Military Prepares Feb 20, 2026 Tentative Agreement Reached to End Six-Week Nurses Strike in New York City Feb 20, 2026 Trump Says He Is Weighing a Limited Military Strike on Iran Feb 20, 2026 Explainer: Possible Charge Facing King Charles’ Brother After Arrest Feb 20, 2026 U.S. Signals Terrorism Concern After Death of French Far-Right Activist Feb 20, 2026