Economy February 19, 2026

UK Has Not Approved Use of British Bases for Any Potential US Strike on Iran, White House Plans Under Review

Withdrawal of US support for Chagos transfer follows UK refusal to pre-authorize use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford amid legal concerns

By Nina Shah
UK Has Not Approved Use of British Bases for Any Potential US Strike on Iran, White House Plans Under Review

The White House has prepared detailed operational plans that would rely on British facilities - Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford - for potential strikes on Iran. The UK has not given prior approval for use of those bases for such an operation, citing worries about compliance with international law. In response to the absence of clearance, President Trump has pulled his backing for a separate diplomatic agreement on the Chagos Islands.

Key Points

  • White House contingency planning includes potential use of Diego Garcia and RAF Fairford for operations against Iran; any use of those British bases requires prior UK government approval - impacts defense and military aviation sectors.
  • The UK has not granted permission for use of its bases for a potential strike, citing concerns about compliance with international law - impacts government-to-government cooperation and legal advisory functions.
  • President Trump withdrew support for the Chagos Islands transfer after the UK refused pre-authorization for base use; conversations between the leaders occurred the night before the public reversal - impacts diplomatic relations and geopolitical risk assessments.

A reported US plan to stage potential military operations against Iran using facilities on British territory has hit a legal and diplomatic roadblock after the UK declined to pre-authorize use of its bases without further review.

According to the reporting, detailed White House contingency plans under development envision operations involving Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean and RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire - the latter known to host America's European fleet of heavy bombers. Current bilateral arrangements between the UK and the US require that any military action launched from those bases have prior approval from the UK government.

British officials have not granted permission for the bases to be used for any potential strike on Iran, the reporting says, pointing to concerns that participation could run afoul of international law. The legal issue cited is the proposition that international law does not distinguish between a state that carries out an internationally wrongful act and a state that provides support for that act if the supporting state has knowledge of the circumstances surrounding it.

The sequence of diplomatic moves described in the report links this refusal to a shift in US posture on a separate matter. President Trump reportedly withdrew his support for an agreement to transfer the Chagos Islands to Mauritius after the UK resisted pre-clearing US use of the military bases.

Further context on domestic oversight of base usage was noted with reference to 2021 parliamentary exchanges. At that time, John Healey - now serving as defense secretary - sought clarification in Parliament about the rules that apply when US forces propose to use British bases. He was informed that any proposed operation would need to adhere to UK law and to Britain’s interpretation of the relevant rules of international law.

The sequence outlined in the reporting highlights three interlinked constraints: bilateral base-use agreements requiring UK approval, the UK’s assessment of international legal exposure for supporting third-party military action, and the diplomatic consequences that flow from withheld approvals. The reporting also records a direct conversation between President Trump and Prime Minister Starmer the night before the public reversal on the Chagos transfer, tied to the ultimatum delivered to Iran.


Contextual note - The material presented here follows the details reported about interactions between the US and UK on base use and the related diplomatic developments. Where the reporting linked specific conversations and decisions, those elements are reflected above without additional inference.

Risks

  • Uncertainty over UK authorization for US operations from British bases creates operational and planning risk for defense forces and contractors involved in strategic heavy bomber deployments.
  • Potential legal exposure under international law if the UK is judged to have provided knowledge-based support for an internationally wrongful act - risk for legal and governmental advisory sectors.
  • Withheld approvals may produce diplomatic friction between the UK and US, introducing policy and geopolitical uncertainty that could affect defence procurement planning and international military cooperation.

More from Economy

Trump Announces Plan for 'Even Stronger' Tariff Actions After Supreme Court Setback Feb 20, 2026 Trump Denounces Supreme Court Ruling on Tariffs, Signals Sweeping Alternatives Feb 20, 2026 Dallas Fed's Logan Says Policy Is Well Positioned as Inflation Risks Persist Feb 20, 2026 Small Toy Maker at Center of Landmark Ruling as Supreme Court Rejects Trump-Era Tariffs Feb 20, 2026 Tens of Thousands Depart Syrian Camp for Families of Islamic State After Guard Breakdown Feb 20, 2026