Economy February 13, 2026

Bedding Maker Drops 'Swift Home' Trademark Bid After Challenge by Taylor Swift's Company

Cathay Home abandons contested application after TAS Rights Management LLC argues proposed cursive logo mimics the singer's signature and could confuse consumers

By Hana Yamamoto
Bedding Maker Drops 'Swift Home' Trademark Bid After Challenge by Taylor Swift's Company

Cathay Home Inc has withdrawn a federal trademark application for the name 'Swift Home' after facing opposition from Taylor Swift's company, TAS Rights Management LLC. The challenge, centered on a cursive rendition of the word "Swift" in Cathay's proposed logo, prompted Cathay's attorney to say the company would not pursue registration for a mark it deemed nonessential to its business.

Key Points

  • Cathay Home Inc abandoned a federal trademark application for "Swift Home" after an opposition by TAS Rights Management LLC over a cursive "Swift" logo that was said to resemble the singer's trademarked signature - impacts trademarks and brand protection in consumer goods.
  • Cathay's attorney stated the company had not used the disputed mark in commerce and chose not to pursue registration because it was not essential to the business - relevant to corporate trademark strategy and risk management in the home goods sector.
  • Cathay sells through major retailers including Bed Bath & Beyond, Target and Nordstrom, and had applied last year to register the mark covering bedding items such as pillows, mattresses and sheets - affecting retail distribution and product branding for bedding manufacturers.

Summary: Cathay Home Inc abandoned a federal trademark application for "Swift Home" after an opposition from TAS Rights Management LLC, which argued that the cursive "Swift" element in Cathay's proposed logo closely resembles the singer's trademarked signature and could lead consumers to believe she endorsed the products. An attorney for Cathay said the company had not used the contested mark in commerce and chose not to press the registration.


Details of the dispute

An attorney for Cathay Home Inc, Ting Geng, said on Friday that the company had elected to discontinue its application for a federal "Swift Home" trademark. The decision followed a filing by TAS Rights Management LLC to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Wednesday, which argued the cursive "Swift" in the bedding company's proposed logo too closely resembled the performers registered signature and therefore risked misleading consumers into thinking the singer endorsed Cathay's goods.

Geng told reporters that "Our client has not used the disputed mark in commerce." He added: "After evaluating the circumstances, our client elected not to pursue registration of a mark it did not consider essential to its business."

Geng also said Cathay had previously entered into a coexistence agreement with the singer for another "Swift Home" trademark that was not part of the present opposition.


Trademark filings and commercial footprint

Cathay applied last year to register a federal "Swift Home" mark covering bedding items such as pillows, mattresses and sheets. Cathay's website lists distribution through national retailers including Bed Bath & Beyond, Target, Nordstrom and other outlets.

The singer's filing to the trademark office stated that she owns federal trademarks for the use of her name on bed linens, clothing and other products, and that Cathay's proposed mark would likely cause consumer confusion. Cathay did not file a response to that argument at the trademark office, according to available information.

Cathay's reported abandonment of the new application was not immediately visible in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's online records. Representatives for the singer did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the matter.


Context on the artist named in the opposition

The singer at the center of the trademark opposition is a 14-time Grammy Award winner. Her recent "Eras" tour has been described as the highest-grossing concert tour of all time. The filing from her company emphasized ownership of federal trademarks covering the use of her name on consumer goods and argued that the Cathay mark could create confusion among consumers.


Note: This report reflects the information that has been made public about the application, the opposition filing, and Cathay's stated decision. It does not introduce additional claims beyond those disclosed by the parties.

Risks

  • Consumer confusion risk alleged by TAS Rights Management LLC could lead to opposition and legal challenges for companies using marks similar to high-profile personal names - impacts legal and branding costs for consumer goods firms.
  • Trademark disputes may lead companies to withdraw nonessential applications, potentially limiting product branding options and slowing market expansion for affected product lines - impacts marketing and product strategy in the home goods and retail sectors.
  • Uncertainty in official records - Cathay's abandonment was not immediately reflected in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office database, creating short-term visibility issues for competitors, retailers and licensors monitoring trademark status - impacts legal monitoring and competitive intelligence functions.

More from Economy

Supreme Court Ruling Narrows Presidential Tariff Options, Treasury Secretary Says Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Curbs Emergency Tariff Authority, Sparking Market and Policy Reactions Feb 20, 2026 Brazil Says U.S. Supreme Court Decision Restores Country's Edge in American Market Feb 20, 2026 Musalem Says Fed Stance Appropriate; One-for-One Tariff Replacement Would Barely Shift Outlook Feb 20, 2026 Supreme Court Decision Limits One Tariff Route but Leaves Global Trade in Flux Feb 20, 2026