Commodities February 16, 2026

U.S. Airlift of Microreactor Aims to Prove Rapid Deployment for Military and Civil Use

Departments of Energy and Defense fly Valar Atomics Ward microreactor — unfueled — to Hill Air Force Base in a test of logistics and policy readiness

By Caleb Monroe
U.S. Airlift of Microreactor Aims to Prove Rapid Deployment for Military and Civil Use

Federal energy and defense officials on Feb. 15 flew a small, unfueled nuclear microreactor from California to Utah aboard a C-17 transport to demonstrate the potential for rapidly deploying compact nuclear power for military and civilian applications. The demonstration, involving a Valar Atomics Ward microreactor, included senior officials on the flight and highlights both government backing for small reactors and persistent questions about cost competitiveness and radioactive waste management.

Key Points

  • Federal agencies completed the first air transport of a Valar Atomics Ward microreactor - unfueled - by C-17 from California to Hill Air Force Base, Utah, with senior DOE and DOD officials on board, demonstrating logistical capability.
  • Valar’s Ward microreactor is described as slightly larger than a minivan and rated up to 5 megawatts; it will begin operating this July at 100 kilowatts, peak at 250 kilowatts this year, and aims for test power sales in 2027 and full commercialization in 2028. Sectors impacted: energy, defense, and remote power infrastructure.
  • Policy actions have supported microreactor development, including four executive orders aimed at expanding domestic nuclear deployment and Energy Department grants for small modular reactors; however, fuel fabrication and enrichment rely on additional federal enabling measures.

Federal energy and defense agencies on Feb. 15 completed the first air transport of a small nuclear reactor inside a military cargo plane, moving a Valar Atomics Ward microreactor - without nuclear fuel - from California to Hill Air Force Base in Utah. The flight used a C-17 transport and included senior officials from both the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense, who described the mission as a test of the concept’s logistical feasibility.

Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Michael Duffey were on board the C-17 during the transfer, which officials framed as evidence that compact nuclear systems could be moved quickly to support both military operations and civilian needs. Duffey said the demonstration advances the ability to "deploy nuclear power when and where it is needed to give our nation’s warfighters the tools to win in battle."

The microreactor used in the exercise is one of Valar Atomics’ Ward units and is described by the company as slightly larger than a minivan. Valar’s chief executive, Isaiah Taylor, told reporters the unit can produce up to 5 megawatts of electricity, a capacity the company equated to powering approximately 5,000 homes. Taylor said the reactor will begin operating this July at an initial output of 100 kilowatts, reach 250 kilowatts later in the year, and ultimately be capable of its full 5 megawatt rating.

Valar has projected a timeline for commercialization: selling power on a test basis in 2027 and moving to full commercial operations in 2028. Taylor also noted that while private firms are financing their own reactor development, they require government action to enable domestic fuel fabrication and uranium enrichment.

Officials provided additional operational details: the fuel for Valar’s reactor will be transported from the Nevada National Security Site to a San Rafael facility, according to Energy Secretary Wright. For the demonstration flight itself, the reactor was transported without fuel.


Policy and program context

The demonstration occurs against a backdrop of policy moves intended to expand U.S. nuclear capacity. The current administration has identified small reactors as a component of efforts to broaden domestic energy production. Last May, four executive orders were issued with the stated aim of boosting domestic nuclear deployment to meet growing energy needs tied to national security and competitive advances in artificial intelligence. In December, the Energy Department awarded two grants intended to accelerate development of small modular reactors.

Proponents of microreactors emphasize their portability and potential to serve remote or dispersed locations that currently rely on diesel generators and frequent fuel resupply. The argument is that compact reactors could reduce reliance on fuel convoys by providing on-site electricity for military outposts, isolated communities, or emergency operations.


Critiques and unresolved issues

Not everyone views microreactors as a near-term commercial success. Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said there is "no business case for microreactors," arguing they will generate electricity at significantly higher costs than large nuclear plants and many renewables if they function as designed. Lyman also cautioned that even small generators produce a notable volume of radioactive waste.

Other analysts cited in the discussion say reactor designers are not always required to incorporate waste reduction into initial designs beyond specifying how waste will be managed after generation. Disposal remains an unsettled question: Energy Department officials said they are in conversations with several states, including Utah, about hosting facilities that could either reprocess spent fuel or provide long-term disposal options.


Operational milestones

Energy Secretary Wright said the department plans to have three microreactors reach criticality - the point at which a nuclear chain reaction is self-sustaining - by July 4. The timeline and the airlift demonstration are intended to show how quickly such systems could be moved and brought online, but the broader commercial and waste-management pathways remain subject to federal policy choices and local hosting agreements.

Risks

  • Cost competitiveness: Critics contend microreactors will generate electricity at higher per-unit costs than larger nuclear plants and many renewables, presenting a commercial risk for energy investors and utilities.
  • Radioactive waste management: Even small reactors produce significant radioactive waste, and disposal or reprocessing pathways have not been fully resolved, posing regulatory and environmental risks for governments and contractors.
  • Dependence on federal enabling actions and host-state agreements: Commercial progress requires government steps for fuel fabrication and enrichment and agreements with states to host reprocessing or disposal facilities, introducing political and permitting uncertainties that affect deployment timelines.

More from Commodities

Cuba Turns to Solar as Fuel Supplies and Power Grid Strain Under U.S. Measures Feb 20, 2026 Citigroup Maps Out Oil Price Paths as U.S.-Iran Tensions Mount Feb 20, 2026 Oil Rises, Tech and Credit Nervous as Geopolitics and AI Spending Reshape Markets Feb 20, 2026 EPA to Roll Back Mercury and Air Toxics Limits on Coal Plants, Citing Grid Reliability Feb 20, 2026 Raymond James: U.S. Military Action in Iran 'Likely at This Stage' as Tensions Rise Feb 20, 2026