Stock Markets April 3, 2026

Nevada Court Extends Order Preventing Kalshi from Offering Event Contracts Without Gaming License

Judge issues preliminary injunction sought by state regulators, pausing Kalshi's sports, elections and entertainment contracts while longer-term relief is drafted

By Maya Rios
Nevada Court Extends Order Preventing Kalshi from Offering Event Contracts Without Gaming License

A Nevada judge has extended a court order that bars Kalshi from offering event-based trading contracts to state residents unless the company obtains a Nevada gaming license. The extension follows a hearing in Carson City where the judge sided with the Nevada Gaming Control Board's request for a preliminary injunction, and it keeps in place a temporary ban on sports, elections and entertainment-related contracts while the court finalizes longer-term restrictions.

Key Points

  • A Nevada judge granted a preliminary injunction that bars Kalshi from offering sports, elections and entertainment event contracts in the state without a Nevada gaming license.
  • Judge Jason Woodbury concluded Kalshi's event contracts are functionally equivalent to state-regulated gambling, rejecting the company's argument that the contracts qualify as CFTC-governed swaps.
  • The decision comes amid broader legal clashes involving the CFTC and several states, including criminal charges in Arizona and an injunction in Massachusetts that is under appeal.

A Nevada district court on Friday prolonged a restriction preventing Kalshi from offering event-based contracts to residents of the state without obtaining a Nevada gaming license.

Judge Jason Woodbury, speaking at the conclusion of a hearing in Carson City, said he would enter the preliminary injunction sought by the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Under the injunction, Kalshi is barred from making available event contracts in Nevada that would let customers effectively wager on sports or other events unless the company first secures a state gambling license.

Attorneys for Kalshi, a New York-based operator of prediction markets, argued during the hearing that the products at issue are "swaps" that fall under the exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The CFTC has made a similar argument in related litigation.

Judge Woodbury said he was not persuaded by that argument. He drew a comparison between placing a wager through a Nevada-licensed gaming operator and purchasing a sporting-event contract on Kalshi's platform, saying the two activities are indistinguishable in their practical effect. "No matter how you slice it, that conduct is indistinguishable," he said. "So I find based on the arguments that have been presented that it is a gaming activity that is prohibited for any non-licensee to engage in."

The judge extended a temporary restraining order he had issued on March 20. That earlier order initially barred Kalshi from offering sports, elections and entertainment-related event contracts in Nevada for 14 days; Woodbury extended that ban through April 17 while he works to finalize the terms of a longer-term injunction.

Kalshi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Nevada is currently the only state to have secured a court-enforced, in-effect ban against Kalshi. The company has been at the center of a mounting legal dispute over the extent to which states can regulate prediction markets.

Operators like Kalshi facilitate trading in so-called "event contracts," which allow users to take financial positions tied to the outcomes of events ranging from sporting contests to elections and entertainment outcomes. In recent days, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed suit against three states to challenge their ability to regulate firms of this type.

One of those states, Arizona, recently initiated criminal charges against Kalshi for allegedly operating an illegal gambling business within its borders. A separate injunction issued in Massachusetts that would prevent Kalshi from offering sports event contracts in that state is currently on hold pending the company's appeal.


Readouts

  • The court's action leaves in place a prohibition on Kalshi offering specific event contracts in Nevada while a more permanent injunction is drafted.
  • The case highlights unresolved questions about the proper regulatory authority over prediction markets, with both state gaming regulators and the CFTC staking competing jurisdictional claims.

Risks

  • Legal uncertainty over which authority - state gaming regulators or the CFTC - has jurisdiction creates risks for prediction market operators and could affect firms in the financial technology and gaming sectors.
  • Differing court outcomes across states could produce a fragmented regulatory landscape, raising compliance and enforcement risks for companies that operate nationally.
  • Pending litigation and potential criminal enforcement actions in some states introduce operational and reputational risks for companies offering event-based trading products.

More from Stock Markets

Proxy Adviser ISS Urges Shareholders to Oppose BP Board Move to Remove Past Climate Reporting Resolutions Apr 4, 2026 Death Toll Across the Middle East Rises as Iran Conflict Spreads Apr 3, 2026 Moscow market edges lower as mining, oil & gas and manufacturing weigh on MOEX Apr 3, 2026 Private Credit Strains Grow as Redemptions Rise and AI Risks Loom Apr 3, 2026 Musk Directs IPO Banks to Purchase Grok Subscriptions as SpaceX Prepares Massive Listing Apr 3, 2026