Stock Markets April 6, 2026

BlackRock moves to add Nasdaq-100 ETF, setting up direct rivalry with Invesco

iShares Nasdaq-100 ETF (IQQ) filed with SEC; fees unreported as competition centers on Invesco’s QQQ

By Marcus Reed QQQ NDAQ
BlackRock moves to add Nasdaq-100 ETF, setting up direct rivalry with Invesco
QQQ NDAQ

BlackRock has submitted a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission for an ETF intended to track the Nasdaq-100 index. The proposed iShares Nasdaq-100 ETF would trade under the ticker IQQ and enter a market with few funds that directly mirror the tech-heavy benchmark, challenging Invesco’s QQQ Trust ETF, which manages roughly $376 billion.

Key Points

  • BlackRock filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday to launch iShares Nasdaq-100 ETF, which would trade under the ticker IQQ.
  • Fees for the proposed fund were not disclosed in the filing.
  • The new ETF would compete with Invesco’s QQQ Trust ETF, which holds about $376 billion in assets, and would join a small group of products that exclusively track the Nasdaq-100; sectors impacted include asset management, capital markets, and technology.

BlackRock has filed for a new exchange-traded fund designed to follow the Nasdaq-100 index, according to a regulatory filing made on Monday. The proposed vehicle will be named iShares Nasdaq-100 ETF and is slated to trade under the ticker IQQ. The filing did not disclose the fee structure for the product.

If launched, the fund would compete directly with Invesco’s QQQ Trust ETF, one of the world’s largest exchange-traded funds. Data compiled by LSEG show Invesco’s QQQ Trust holds about $376 billion in assets under management, making it a dominant product for investors seeking benchmark-linked exposure to large-cap growth, particularly technology stocks.

Only a small number of publicly available ETFs track the Nasdaq-100 exclusively, according to VettaFi’s ETF database. That limited set of direct trackers has left Invesco’s QQQ as a widely traded and popular avenue for getting exposure to the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.

The Nasdaq-100 itself includes major technology companies such as Nvidia and Apple among its membership. In a public statement, Nasdaq said the move by BlackRock is aimed at broadening investor access:

"Expanding access to the Nasdaq-100 is intended to be additive, supporting investors by improving the efficiency, liquidity, and availability of benchmark-linked exposure across markets and product types," Nasdaq said.

The filing and related commentary underscore a potential shift in the competitive landscape for products tied to the Nasdaq-100. Market participants and investors will likely watch for details the filing did not provide, notably the fee schedule for IQQ, which could influence adoption and trading activity if the fund progresses to launch.

Separately, commentary appearing alongside market coverage raised questions about individual Nasdaq-related securities. For example, promotional material referenced NDAQ and tools that evaluate it using multiple financial metrics; that material described using AI to assess fundamentals, momentum, and valuation across many companies. The filing itself, however, focused narrowly on the ETF proposal and did not address broader promotional programs or evaluations.

BlackRock’s application places it in direct competition in a narrow segment of the ETF market where a handful of products provide direct, exclusive exposure to the Nasdaq-100, and where Invesco’s QQQ has been the primary incumbent.

Risks

  • Fees for the proposed IQQ have not been specified, creating uncertainty for investors about the cost competitiveness of the product - this affects asset managers and ETF investors.
  • Increased competition could alter liquidity and market share dynamics for existing Nasdaq-100 trackers, particularly Invesco’s QQQ Trust - this impacts capital markets and ETF trading activity.
  • A limited number of direct Nasdaq-100 tracking ETFs means market impact and investor adoption of any new entrant are uncertain, which could affect availability and trading patterns in technology-focused passive exposures.

More from Stock Markets

Casablanca Market Inches Higher as Moroccan All Shares Reaches One-Month Peak Apr 6, 2026 AI Tools Adopted by Majority of U.S. Retail Investors, Survey Finds Apr 6, 2026 Goldman Sachs Urges Investors to Favor Large-Cap Petrochemical Names as Middle East Shock Spreads Apr 6, 2026 Barings Private Credit Fund Restricts Redemptions After Surge in Requests Apr 6, 2026 Morgan Stanley Sees Coal India, JSW Steel Set to Outperform; Jindal Steel Lagging Apr 6, 2026